Tag Archives: vera zvonareva

smack dab in the middle

Last Sunday, it all kicked off.  The eager crowds mingled through the grounds and play began.  Next Sunday, the only match to be played will be the last, the men’s final.

Today, the middle Sunday, some of the story has been told, but not all.  The round of sixteen started and the second match on Lenglen between Fabio Fognini and Albert Montanes turned out to be a more than four hour five setter complete with twists and turns, and a lot of drama especially in the last set.

When I turned on the television after seven this morning,  I heard Leif Shiras saying someone had 97 unforced errors.  Not having seen who was playing or the score, I figured if there were that many errors it had to be a five set match.  With a cup of coffee, I watched the exciting finish to a match that was 8-8 at that point.

Earlier in the set, Fognini was experiencing leg cramps and they don’t go away.  By the time I tuned in, he could barely walk or even stand up but he played the match out, withstood a slew of foot fault calls, including on his own game point and even his own match point (and he didn’t even blanch, much less walk over and shout Italian obscenities at the linesman…)and saved five, count them, five!, match points before finally closing down the match at 11-9.  It was pretty incredible.

He was both cheered and booed, the latter because of some controversy surrounding the leg cramping and whether he was entitled to any medical treatment.  Leg cramping can only be treated during changeovers or change of ends and during that allotted time.  It doesn’t qualify for a medical treatment time out.  But the trainers said Fognini’s troubles were not leg cramping, so I guess he was entitled to what he took.  And if the crowd didn’t like the way he won, take it up with the umpire who allowed everything that happened.

The match brings up one of the trickiest circumstances a player can face on court, that of the injured opponent.  You’d think it would make it easier, your opponent is hampered in some way, you’re not, just play your game and win.  But it really isn’t as simple a it seems.  Your concern for the other player enters into it, so now you have trouble competing the way you were before.  And you’re trying to calibrate how you need to play against the injured player, go for more, hold back, and it all gets confusing.  Change one thing, change everything, as a friend of mine always says, and so it is.

It was a good day for Italy because after that absorbing match, on walked Francesca Schiavone, the defending champion, and Jelena Jankovic for a war that was both expected and realized.  Not surprisingly, it went the distance with Francesca taking the first set, Jelena the second and they went neck and neck to 4-4 in the third for a very tense finish.

Both of these girls are emotional and it’s fun to watch.  John McEnroe, Mary Carillo and Ted Robinson commentated the match and there was plenty of laughter and teasing as Francesca yelled at her box and Jelena yelled at hers.  A lot was on the line for both players.  Jelena has never won a major and at twenty six the window starts to close, so she really wanted to win this match and advance.

For Francesca, she’s the defending champion and she’d like to take it home again.  Not to mention that the first match of the day on Chatrier saw Vera Zvonareva, the number three seed, lose to the fourteenth seed, Russian nineteen year old Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova.   So she’s really thinking maybe she can go all the way.

Meanwhile, there’s a match to finish as all these emotions swirl and bubble up.  And Francesca broke Jelena in the next game to take a 5-4 lead and then serve for it.  She did just that and won it.  Before she left the court, after signing a few of those big tennis balls, she got down on the court and kissed it.

By that time it was nearly seven o’clock and once again there was concern if the next match between David Ferrer and Gael Monfils would be able to finish.  Ferrer came out the same as he always does, ready to fight to the last.  Monfils came out as he always does, so athletic you think he’s made of plastic you can shape and mold, so much the showman you can’t help but be charmed.  On Kids Day a few days ago, Gael entertained on Chatrier by doing a one handed handstand!  Are you kidding?

So was it to be slow and steady or flash and flamboyance that would take the day?  We’ll have to wait until tomorrow to find out.  The players got in three sets, with Monfils up 2-1, there was still some daylight so they opened the fourth set.  But no television coverage then, so I listened to RG Radio for the last bit.  Monfils injured himself in some way, Ferrer broke him to go up 2-0 and play was stopped until tomorrow.

Roger Federer has traveled under the radar so far, but he hasn’t dropped a set yet.  He played his fellow Swiss and friend, Stan Wawrinka, and won in straights.

Djokovic did the same against Richard Gasquet.  What was Richard doing, standing ten feet behind the baseline the whole time?  Certain things in tennis are determined by the laws of geometry and physics.  If you stand that far back, you can’t create angles and your opponent can.  And standing back that far it takes longer for your ball to travel back to your opponent which gives him more time to set up for the next shot and you less chance of winning the point.

If you know you can’t win from back there, why be there?  You might as well make it a walkover and go have lunch.    Hug the baseline, get into net when you can and if you still lose, well, okay, at least you had a chance to win.

Still, no one expected Richard Gasquet to win the match today and it would have been a complete miracle if he had.  It’s great that he got to the round of sixteen and now I hope he does as well or better at Wimbledon.

The French were consoled by the win of another countryman, or woman in this case.  Marion Bartoli advances to the quarterfinals, and she’ll have plenty of energy since she only played one set and two games before Gisela Dulko retired with an injury.

The final match to talk about today took place on Court One instead of Lenglen, because of the long matches there.  Kuznetsova against Hantuchova, it went three and Sveta won it.  So she’s a former champion and Francesca is the current champion, and Maria wants to win it to complete her Grand Slam wins.

And maybe none of them does it.  Maybe Azarenka wins or Kvitova or Petkovic.  It’s still wide open, perhaps even more so with the top three seeds and Stosur all gone.

Lots more tomorrow, what better way to spend Memorial Day weekend?  See you then and thanks for hanging out with me at Cupcakes and Tennis, the tennis blog with a sweet spot.

down to the wire

Okay, let’s start right up front with the men’s semi-finals decided just moments ago by the outcome of the Nadal/Berdych match played in front of a totally packed house.  Nadal won in three sets.  The first he played like a maestro, and then he had to fight for the rest of the match.  It looked like maybe he had the same stiff neck after the first set that prevented Gilles Simon from playing his full match against Roger this afternoon (he retired at 3-0 in the first set to the great displeasure of the crowd; they booed as he left the court which I thought was bad form, the guy would not have left the court if he could have played).  Still, Rafa won, whatever the physical difficulty was, and tomorrow night I will be there along with thousands of others to watch Rafa and Roger play for the first time in North America since 2005.  This is real tennis excitement.

And I love that of the final four, you’ve got Rafa, Roger, Novak Djokovic, the top three players in the world and who else?  Number fourteen, Mardy Fish!  Go Fish.  Love Mardy.  I don’t think he’ll win against Novak, who is unbeaten this year.  That’s right. Twenty matches, twenty wins.  Or is it twenty one?  That kind of winning streak does not happen often.  John McEnroe had a 39 match winning streak, and someone else almost as many, not remembering right now.

I do have to say that Brad Gilbert is truly impressive when it comes to knowing tennis history.  Last night, when Cliijsters was down 1-5 in the second set against Azarenka, Mary Joe Fernandez was asking about other consecutive match dig outs (Kim had saved five match points the night before against Ivanovic.) and Gilbert came up with some pretty obtuse information and he was right.

Kim lost last night.  She seemed flat after her late match the previous day and only at the end when defeat seemed a short step away did she rally.  There comes a point in many matches when the loss is nearly inevitable and it’s always interesting to watch how the almost defeated player just loosens up and goes for his or her shots, what the hell, and often it can turn a match around.  One thing I think is clearer when you are watching tennis live is the mental game.  You can follow that thread more easily, you can see the players during the changeovers, you can see a lot of things you don’t/can’t see on television.  You can just read that story in a way you can’t otherwise and tennis is such a mental game, it’s a huge part of it to be able to know what’s going with the players internally.

Back to Mardy Fish for a moment.  I didn’t give him much of a chance against Del Potro and he pulled that out, so who knows?  Still, I love it that Mardy is in the semis.  If he wins tomorrow, he’ll be in the top ten, a major goal of his.  I don’t know what the weather conditions will be for their afternoon match.  Today it was just plain a bitch for Sharapova and Petkovic.  The wind was constant and strong, it was extremely hot and humid.  Petko played a great first set and then just went away.  So Maria is in the final, and will be in the top ten for the first time in over two years.

She’ll play either Azarenka or Zvonareva who are doing battle as we speak.  God help us if it’s Victoria because she shrieks as loud as Maria.  Vera is quiet.  Please win Vera, tonight and Saturday.

The stadium looks different on television than it does in person.  On tv, it looks huge and kind of stretched out.  Actually, it’s a good size but still feels intimate.  As I wrote earlier, I like it the best of the three large tennis stadiums in the U.S.

I’m going to check on Vera and Victoria, then catch some sleep.  Big tennis tomorrow.

upside down down under

It’s far away, Australia, and the water circles down the drain in the opposite direction from the northern hemisphere.   And when tennis is played, the results can be startling as well.

Take the women’s semifinal between Li Na and Caroline Wozniacki.  Caroline took the first set 6-3 and it made it look like her general modus operandi, to defend well and hit conservatively, keeping her unforced errors down and letting her opponent make all the mistakes, would prevail.  The second set was harder fought and Li Na cleaned up her unforced error to winners ratio considerably.  Still, at the business end of the set, it was Caroline who served for it, at 5-4, and she had a match point.

But Li Na saved it and went on to win that game, even it up at 5-5, and grab the second set 7-5, an unexpected result.  And in the deciding third set, Li Na showed the beauty and reward of no guts, no glory.  She kept going for her winners and making them and it made Caroline’s game, which really needs a winning shot, look a little dowdy.

On court afterwards, Li Na told us in a thoroughly delightful manner about her husband’s snoring that had kept her awake the night before and how prize money had motivated her to keep going when she was about to lose the match and how her mother has a life of her own and doesn’t want to come with her daughter to watch her compete.  She’s a lot of fun both on and off the court.  And talk about turning things upside down, Li Na is the first Asian woman to reach the finals of a Grand Slam, a new historic benchmark to go along with many others.

You will remember two things before this final.  One, Li Na is the only woman to be in the quarters both last year and this, and two, Li Na just beat Kim Cliijsters in the final in the run-up tournament in Sydney.

It’s Kim who will be on the other side of the net for the women’s final on Saturday evening in Melbourne.  She made quick work of Zvonareva who tried everything, but failed to better the Belgian.  It was two sets, 6-3, 6-3.  And whichever woman triumphs, she will be a first time winner of the Australian Open.

The women’s semifinals are played back to back, but the men’s stretch out over two consecutive evenings.  Tonight, yet to be played, we’ve got David Ferrer, fresh off his win over Rafa, and Andy Murray.  One of those two will play last night’s winner, Novak Djokovic who played the match of his life against Roger and won it in straights, 7-6, 7-5, 6-4.

The first set was an even trade, no breaks of serve.  Roger might have been a little more aggressive on a couple of points in the tiebreak, but basically both were strong.  The second set was a crazy roller coaster with Novak down a break, then up a break, then down 5-2 and everyone, myself included and possibly Roger, thinking, well, that’s a wrap, soon it will be one set a piece and then let’s see what happens.  Wrong.  Novak brought it even to 5-5 and never looked back.   With a two sets to love lead, Roger really had his work cut out for him.  The problem was not that he was playing badly, it was that Novak was playing better.  And Roger’s groundstrokes played right into his hand.  He couldn’t get to net, another problem.  It seemed to work when he mixed up the pace and gave Novak some junk balls, but ultimately, Novak was not to be denied.

With Rafa out, Novak knows this is his chance.  He’s won the title once before, his only Grand Slam victory, so if there’s a court he can win on, it’s Rod Laver.  Not to mention the loud and large Serbian fan contingent who dress, put on make-up, wave the flag, cheer and sing at high volume.  During last night’s match, there were some moments you could tell Roger was getting irritated.  Novak’s box seemed to be behaving themselves, but Roger kept looking up there.  There’s history there, the world number one has not always been pleased.

Who will win tonight?  Ferrer or Murray?  It should be a good match, a slugfest, probably a long match with long rallies.  Both Andy and David are major counterpunchers, both are capable of running everything down, making incredible gets, producing shots from anywhere on the court.  Expect some brilliance.  I’ll give the slight edge to Murray in a five setter, and if it’s a Murray/Djokovic final, I’d say Novak will come out on top.

But it’s Down Under, so it could be and probably will be Upside Down.