Tag Archives: darren cahill

tennis, california style

Both the men’s and women’s tour were in California this past week, the ladies on the campus of Stanford in Palo Alto and the men at UCLA in, well, LA.  The Farmers Classic in Los Angeles is the oldest continuously running tennis event in the country, started way back in 1927.  All the greats have won it including, in the Open Era, Sampras, McEnroe and Connors.

Yesterday, Mardy Fish tried to join this exalted company but Ernests Gulbis of Latvia proved to be too much for him on the day.  Mardy lives in Los Angeles now so it’s an especially important tournament for him, all friends and family in attendance, driving his own car to and from work, sleeping in his own bed.

He won against Isner in the final last Sunday in Atlanta, really digging deep for the victory.

Against Ryan Harrison in the semifinal, a repeat of Atlanta, he played a flawless first set of tennis, 6-0, but then had to work very hard in the next two sets to advance, 6-4, 7-6.  So he wasn’t as fresh as he might have hoped to be yesterday.

Gulbis is an interesting young player.  Cliff Drysdale, ESPN commentator, appears to be so in love with his game it’s practically a bromance.  I’ve been watching him for the past few years along with many others and I’m afraid I made the same mistake as everyone else as well.  I had figured the inconsistency in his game derived from the fact that he comes from a very wealthy family, doesn’t need the money and therefore isn’t as motivated.

Darren Cahill tells us otherwise.  He actually wants all of this very badly and works hard for it.  He just added Guillermo Canas to his team, as coach, and already you can see the difference.  His forehand can still fly, but he’s got incredible power on the backhand side and his big 130 plus serve gets him out of trouble reliably.

I always like to see Mardy win, but I couldn’t begrudge Gulbis this one.  He earned it, beating del Potro and Bogomolov en route and he’s had a rough year until now.  He bounced out in the first round of the past five tournaments he played and has been ill and on strong antibiotics the first half of the year.  So this win will boost his self confidence a lot and turn the tide.  He’s a quirky player, difficult to get momentum against him because he throws in some of this and some of that and you never know what when.

Mardy for his part is playing terrific tennis.  I didn’t bet against him yesterday, not at number 9 in the world and a title last weekend, but you could tell Gulbis had a real chance.  Mardy won the first set 7-5.  The second set went to Gulbis 6-4, one crucial break and that’s all that was necessary.

In the third set, Gulbis charged out to a 5-1 lead.  Mardy seemed to be done and his movement was hampered, possibly by something he did to his foot or leg during play, it wasn’t clear.  But Gulbis choked when he served for the match at 5-2 and Mardy very nearly leveled that match to five games a piece when he served for it a second time.  He had two break points but couldn’t convert.  It went to deuce, Gulbis scored the ad point and then took it home.

That big serve was really working.  And he got Mardy pushed back behind the baseline into downtown LA and repeatedly finessed drop shots he had no way of reaching in time.   It must have been frustrating for Mardy.  He can blame it on the dog who apparently threw up in bed during the previous night, or was it the night before?

Mardy has plans to play in every tournament leading up to the Open, but we’ll see whether he revises it after the loss or possible tweaking he experienced.

You could write a whole book, and probably a lengthy one, on the subject of comebacks in the game of tennis and it would now include the Serena Williams story.  Never one to shy away from drama and always one to upstage the others, her near death story can only be matched, never trumped.  Last year she suffered a pulmonary embolism and barely got to the hospital in time.

So now here she is, on the tour since returning for Wimbledon, and, yo, girls, she’s baaaaack!   You better believe everyone from Caroline Wozniacki on down is sitting up and taking note.   Last week Serena was 169 in the world; today she’s 79.  There’s every chance she will be seeded at the Open if she keeps on winning.  She has no points to defend; every win just improves her situation.

This, of course, adds tremendous interest to the women’s tour and it’s been lacking.  Serena is thirty years old, still young, but old enough for it to make a difference when you try to get really fit.  That is to say, it’s significantly harder.   But she is clearly happy to be back, to be healthy.  No one walks away from a brush with death unchanged, not even my god Jehovah I only wear clothes once Serena.  You can feel her renewed energy and pleasure and her desire to win.  A fit Serena, happy to be there and determined to win?   Who exactly is going to beat that?

At Stanford, she made Maria Sharapova go away in a hurry, two non- competitive sets.  She beat Sabine Lasicki, another comeback girl and the two of them had a nice moment at the net afterwards.  And yesterday, after Marion Bartoli took a 3-0 lead in the first set, she came right back, won the set, and cruised to the victory.  All three of those players are talented and match tough.  Bartoli took Serena out at Wimbledon.  Lisicki defeated Bartoli at Wimbledon.  Maria made it to the finals.

So ready, set, go.  Both on the men’s and women’s sides the next few weeks will be very interesting, right up to and through the Open.  Settle in, it’s summer, it’s tennis, it’s America.

Thanks for reading Cupcakes and Tennis, the tennis blog with a sweet spot.

australia day

Australia Day is like our Fourth of July, complete with parades, fireworks and way way too much drinking.  And it’s today in Australia.  Vera Zvonareva and Petra Kvitova were in the second set of their quarterfinal match on Rod Laver when the noontime twenty one gun salute announced itself.  They buzz the roof of Rod Laver, not once, but a few times, and it is loud and a little scary.   As if that wasn’t enough distraction, just ten minutes earlier a woman either injured herself or became ill a few rows behind where Kvitova was playing, a true visual and emotional diversion from the tennis, more so for Vera who could see it.  It threw things off for a little while, but Vera, she of the famous meltdowns as recently as a year ago, is now a consummate professional.  She had won the first set and had been up 3-0 in the second but was in danger of possibly losing the set when Petra caught up and the score was 5-4, Kvitova serving.  Vera broke her to win the match.  On to the semifinals for the third time in Grand Slams in the past year.

On the men’s side, yesterday, Roger Federer did to Stan Wawrinka what Wawrinka had done to Andy Roddick two nights before.  He gave him a comprehensive beatdown.  Now it was Stan ten feet behind the baseline, fighting for his life, looking like an amateur.  How is it possible, you wonder, that things are so different depending.  But that is tennis.  Andy had nothing to threaten Stan Wawrinka and then Stan had nothing to bother Roger.  Each player has his or her strengths and weaknesses and those match up in certain ways with other players and their strengths and weaknesses.

And if you had any doubt that the women’s game is anyone’s game, the only player who was in last year’s quarters and this year’s is Li Na of China.  My own pre-match racket bracket picks were only fifty percent correct for the last eight women.  I’m doing better with the men where I got six of eight.

There had been much talk about the Djokovic/Berdych match being a five set thriller, but it wasn’t.  Novak just outran and outdefended and outdid everything that Thomas could put out there.  And he won it in straights, 6-1, 7-6, 6-1.

The beauty of a match these past two days turned out to be, not surprisingly, the quarterfinal encounter between Caroline Wozniacki and Francesca Schiavone, last night.  Everyone thought Francesca couldn’t possibly have anything left to give after her four hour forty four minute marathon match against Kuznetsova.  But they were wrong.  Francesca won the first set and was up in the second before Caroline came to.  Where was she?  In the press room, giving guff, or over on the cricket field learning the game?  Who knows?  She wasn’t on Rod Laver for awhile.  Unsettled, fussing with the tape on her leg.  But then she did click in and that burst of energy met up with some of Francesca’s fatigue; it went three sets, with Wozniacki winning.

But Francesca was no loser.  It was beyond amazing that she played the match she did after what she had been through.  In the press conference after the Kuznetsova match, she just showed more of what you love about her.  When asked if she would be able to play again in two days after the marathon, she said she is young, she can run, she can do anything.  Was she aware of the time they had been on the court?  She said, yes, I was looking at the clock and I say, brava Frankie, you are strong!  Players get asked all the time about their internal process, what they were thinking, but most of the time you get pro forma answers.  Francesca actually gives us a real glimpse in her refreshingly honest and unscripted way.  She said she works for these things and when you do something like this, you feel big.  She’s an inspiration to every player.  At thirty, old in tennis terms, she’s having her greatest success.  After years as a journeyman player, she has become a real star.  Brava.

Kim Clijsters won her match over Aggie Radwanska of Poland in straights, but it was more of a contest than that indicates.  Kim won the first set 6-3 and should have put the second to bed much sooner than she did.  She kind of went away mentally, Kim has these periods in her matches, and let Aggie hang around until the set needed a tiebreak to settle it.  Kim has yet to play her very best tennis but she’s got one more match, against Zvonareva, to get to the final and she’ll need it to win.

Our four semifinalists are Wozniacki and Na Li, Kim and Vera.  It really is any one of these women’s game still, and both the semis and the final, whoever is in it, should be good contests.   Kim is the only one of the four who is a Grand Slam winner, though she has not yet won the Australian Open.  And as Kim would be the first to tell you, it took her about a half dozen tries before she finally closed the deal and hoisted the trophy at the end of one of these majors.  You have to win seven matches against all sorts of opponents, on all different surfaces and courts, in all manner of weather and conditions, staying in all kinds of hotels and apartments, eating different food, drinking new water.  It is not easy.  So even when you make a deep run at these events, you feel, as Frankie told us, “big”.  And if you are the last woman standing, the victor, you would feel huge.  If Caroline or Vera or Li Na win their first Grand Slam this weekend, they will feel big indeed.

Tennis is about the game and it’s about the players and all the human dramas and stories.  It’s about the different countries they come from and where they compete.  And it’s about the fans without whom it would be the tennis version of one hand clapping.  All of that combines in ways both predictable and surprising and often compelling.

As it did last night on Rod Laver Arena as Rafa Nadal and David Ferrer took the court before a packed house.  Rafa, just three matches away from a career Grand Slam, ownership of all four trophies in one year, he won the French, Wimbledon and the US Open in 2010.  He was feeling better from his virus, did well against Cilic, didn’t sweat like crazy as he had been.  Feeling good, Rafa should be able to beat his friend and fellow countryman, David Ferrer, even though their head to head is 3-2, I believe.  Never count Ferrer out, that’s for sure.  If Francesca Schiavone is La Lionessa, David is and has always been The BullDog.  He’s a grinder, he’s fast, he’s a shotmaker and he goes first ball to last with the same intensity, very much like Rafa in this way.

Early in the first set, at 2-1 Ferrer, after a long game when Rafa first served, in which he was broken, he called for the trainer and left the court for a medical time-out.  No one knew what was up.  Sometimes you can see on court when a player has suffered an injury, they turn their ankle in the wrong way, they pull up in pain from a shot, but last night something happened to Rafa that wasn’t as clear as that, and it still isn’t.  He came back to the court, prepared to play, and after a few games it looked like maybe he was going to be able to work through it, but he never really did.  Was it the thigh, the hamstring?  He didn’t retire, something he did exactly one year ago, on Australia Day, against Murray.  He played the match, but Ferrer, who excecuted his game plan to perfection against a wounded Rafa, was the victor in straight sets.

It was a huge disappointment to everyone.  The purists, like Bud Collins, will say it’s not a Slam unless you win all four in the same calendar year.  Rod Laver did it not once but twice.  But anyway you cut it, to hold all four in sequence is an achievement few attain and Rafa’s hopes for that, and all who love him and his game and his spirit, were completely dashed last night.  In his press conference after the match, he asked not to speak about the injury, mostly because he didn’t know what it was, but also, greatly, because he wanted to focus on the match that got played and how well Ferrer had competed.  He does not want to be the guy who only loses because he has an injury, and he does not want to be the player who retires and deprives his opponents of a win they earned.  Rafa accepts that you go out on the court as you are on the day and you compete and you either win or you lose, and then you come back the next day and the next and do it all over again.  He doesn’t want sympathy, he doesn’t make excuses.

In the middle of the match, there was a break, as there always is, for the fireworks display.  You can see them from inside Rod Laver and last year when I was there I watched them outside of the tennis park, at the edge of the river downtown.  They put on a good show, that’s for sure.

So last night all of it combined, the drama, the high stakes, the game and its history and its present and future, the players and their humanity and aspirations, the country and its traditions and proud history, the fans and their fervor.  At the ESPN desk, now with its own Australia Day traditions, there were vegemite sandwiches (disgusting stuff) and meat pies, and lizards and wombats or whatever prickly creature that was.  Only Aussie Darren Cahill could stomach the vegemite, Brad Gilbert went walkabout when the animals started licking Darren’s jacket, Vera Zvonareva tried the vegemite and held the animals.

It didn’t turn out as expected.  It was great.

Happy Australia Day!